A
t F i r s t G l a n c e
At
first glance, there's something unusual about two iconic figures
like Adam and Eve finding their way into the world of Costa Dvorezky's
paintings. But it's not that he hasn't made art historical references
in his oeuvre before. Like those instances, there's a certain
sardonic perversity to them. The couple who were banished from
the pure visuality of God to the profane world of speech are presented
separately, forming a kind of diptych, and accoutered with a few
details. He has a book. She has an apple. These gestures to the
symbols often accompanying the infamous duo do not distract from
the way they are presented. There's something overwhelmingly banal
about them. The viewer encounters them on a one to one basis.
They stand at the most generic of heights, but their eyes do not
lock with the viewer's; there's something vague and distancing
in their glances. Although they gesture out to the viewer, standing
in a mock contrapposto, there's a sense of uneasiness as the environment
which surrounds them decomposes at the periphery.
Unlike many of the bodies which the painter renders, they do not
seem physically strained. They don't struggle, bend or pull. While
their upper bodies have muscle, their lower halves are corpulent.
This heaviness makes them grounded, in no small part due to their
stolid verticality. Such a stance is in stark contrast to a more
common character of Dvorezky's like the Salsa teacher he depicts,
twisting on a mattress and losing all solidity as her body decomposes
into the inanimate objects which surround her. His figures generally
convulse, their fate is to be diagonally torn across the horizon.
It's an infinite pull because it can never be finalized. Movement
requires a stability of space and time which the surface of his
canvas and its constant dissolving of planes suggests is implausible.
In general, his paintings depict a world of horizontals. Bodies
are placed in ambiguous positions with their extremities lurching
from the frame. Even if the figure is vertical, it stands under
the threat of losing ground and being stretched apart. They are
figures of suspension: figures who are always about to fall. But
that's where Adam and Eve's symbolic importance begins to resonate.
After all, this is the pair who fell from the heights and lost
Perfection; they are the patron saints of banality. The use of
these two figures is not an arbitrary reference. It is intimately
tied to the way he renders the world via a subversion of this
myth. The formal properties that Dvorezky works with are completely
inherent within the subject matter.
It's impossible to say if Paradise, like the Earth, is an infinite
horizontal. The fact that the canvas for Adam displays broken
circles carved into the paint hints at a disparity in the cyclical
nature of these spaces. It is possible to suggest that the vertical
thrust of these figures comes from their apparent falling and
the breakdown of vertical supremacy. Pulling themselves from the
mud, they stand erect, but stunted, as though gravity were about
to crush them. Yet, it isn't gravitas that they possess. It's
bathos, not pathos that wins out with his figures. His recent
paintings verge on caricature, even when they are images of the
artist himself or his wife.
The paintings are made of many layers, but the depth is purely
illusory and constantly denuded. There's an extraordinary thinness
to the surface of his canvases. This is accented further by how
fat much of his brushwork is. The layering of the paint does not
allow for a foreground and a background to be firmly established.
As you follow each swath of paint, you realize that the plane
it illustrates vanishes into another and then another. Such an
ellipsoid patterning of elements creates a force of suspension
which mirrors that of so many of the bodies that populate his
work.
Within this kind of suspension, causality is absent. These could
as easily be stationary bodies dissected by space as the other
way around. There's nothing tragic about a world where everything
is suspended. It's not a world where tragedy is possible. Instead,
it is a black comedy for these lurching figures who never speak.
Mouths rarely open in his paintings. It would be pointless for
them to cry or laugh. The body takes on all sensations without
judgment. For this reason, the heads seem to float. They aren't
as often dissected by the layers on the canvas and retain a flatness
and distortion which the rest of the body lacks. Garishly lit
from multiple with the accents of a scarcely diluted yellow, the
faces float.
Dvorezky paints bodies in two distinct modes. First, they are
a strict and distinct set of lines. The delineation of the boundaries
of the body are close to the fluid boundary lines that one normally
finds in a sketch. They immediately seem to seal the body within
a tight envelope which binds the flesh. It is no coincidence in
this regard that many of his earlier paintings played on imagery
from sado-masochistic activity. Binding reveals the multiple faces
of the flesh, which ripple through a set of mottled hues that
shift the modeling of the body. While the erotic situation pushes
this binding to a kind of parody, one can find the examination
of this experience as a constant presence in his work. This strict
determination of the body is quickly undermined by the second
mode in which he renders flesh.
Rather than illustrating the distance between elements, the the
density of the paint operates as a multi-layered skin. The edges
of each variation appear like a scab. This sense of corporeality
is echoed by the unique way that he cuts the canvas, making digs
into the paint to create tension with lines of the grid. There's
a convulsive quality to the bodies he paints. Their affective
state, whether pleasurable or painful, is never determinable.
Rather, the kinetic value which they display is an instance of
sensation at its most innocent. It's in respect to the question
of localizing sensation that one must turn to the kind of surface
which he manufactures. Even shadows are rendered as the decomposition
of bodily elements.
If there is a fetishism in his work, it is in the way he creates
the flesh. It is a complicated kind of fetishism, one which is
unique to certain painters and writers. As the French poet Joe
Bousquet once said, "My wound existed before me, I was born
to embody it. The surface of the body is created by making small
patches of indeterminate matter. These synesthetic zones are given
their intensity by the density of the paint which often thins
to show the grain of the canvas beneath. The greatest tension
is between the nudity of the canvas and the planes which the paint
place on it. The most pronounced surface in his works are the
areas of blankness. These are voids that occasionally puncture
the stuttering between depths. Like the cuts he makes in the canvas,
these are open wounds that deny the body its illusion of solidity.
Every area of the body contains a realm of possibilities and a
variation of intensities. As a result, there is a constant spatial
simultaneity in which the play of sensation is omnipresent and
the visual circuit between these areas remains in constant motion.
There are radical alterations of speed between one quotient of
sensations and another. Movement stutters, stalls and speeds up
again. Such a surface allows for a constant proliferation of details
but never allows them to be accumulated. It's a profligate surface.
All of these procedures amount to the creation of an event, one
which is made of a series of tactile traces that are repeated
at varying speeds in superimposition so that no origin and no
end is ever possible. This painting technique could have led to
superimposition and blurring but instead results in a field where
the ground is continually lost. There is no distance.
In spite of appearances, the paintings do not depict characters
or stories – they depict events, those eccentric moments
which precede and exceed the possibility of narrative. All of
this takes us back to his subversion of the idea of the Fall.
The Fall assumes the beginning of history, that is, of time. It
also assumes the metaphysical significance of verticality and
the loss of Perfection. By metamorphosing the Fall into the state
of suspension, Dvorezky escapes from both banality and Perfection
to create a circuit of unremitting intensity.